A Comprehensive Guide to Reconciling a Credit Card Statement in NetSuite

NetSuite makes accounting and bookkeeping a breeze—once you know how to use the software.


Every successful NetSuite ERP implementation includes a staff who knows how to use the software. As a company, you must be able to perform tasks within the system to make your investment worthwhile. 


We know it’s frustrating to stumble through every tab and field in your ERP, trying to complete simple functions. The SuiteDynamics team has developed comprehensive NetSuite tutorials to guide you through the system and toward digital transformation. 


Read our step-by-step instructions below and learn how to reconcile a credit card statement in NetSuite. Then, schedule a consultation with us to discuss a more in-depth NetSuite training program that ensures your team has the knowledge it needs to maximize the system.


Schedule a FREE Consultation
Graphic stating that more than 60% of large accounting firms surveyed say technology helps improve staff engagement and morale.


Exploring NetSuite's Bank Data Matching and Reconciliation


Before we discuss how to reconcile a credit card statement, let’s cover NetSuite’s Bank Data Matching and Reconciliation feature. It’s one of the system’s standout tools.


Bank Data Matching and Reconciliation simplifies and enhances the process of matching and reconciling bank transactions with your financial records. Automating these tasks significantly reduces manual effort and minimizes human error risk. Here's how it operates.


Bank Statement Import


NetSuite allows users to import bank statements directly into the system. This feature also accommodates various file formats to align with your bank's requirements.


Transaction Matching


The system intelligently matches imported bank transactions (such as payments, invoices, sales orders, and more) with existing financial data within NetSuite. 


Rule-Based Matching


NetSuite allows customers to establish rules and preferences for transaction matching. Users can define rules tailored to specific bank accounts or transaction types.


Auto-Matching


The system uses predefined rules to automatically match transactions, saving time and reducing the necessity for manual intervention.


Manual Reconciliation


NetSuite also offers an intuitive interface for manual bank reconciliation, which you can use when automatic matching isn’t possible. This interface provides real-time visibility into unmatched transactions.


SuiteDynamics experts can explain more about the Bank Data Matching and Reconciliation feature during your custom NetSuite training. We’ll ensure your team understands the system’s components and knows how to boost efficiency and productivity using NetSuite tools.


Schedule a FREE Consultation


How to Reconcile a Credit Card Statement in NetSuite


Follow the steps below, and you'll see why NetSuite’s Bank Data Matching and Reconciliation feature is helpful for reconciling a credit card statement.


  1. Create a liability account for AMEX.
  2. Select “Credit Card” for Type.
  3. Check the box for Use Match Bank Data and Reconcile Account Statement Pages.


The first screenshot showing how to reconcile a credit card statement in NetSuite.


   2.  Connect AMEX for automatic transaction import.

  1. Navigate to Setup>Accounting>Financial Institution. (See our tutorial on setting up bank and credit card feeds in NetSuite.)

   3.  Export the credit card statement in .pdf and Excel.

   4.  In Excel: 

  1. Add a column for the GL Account.
  2. Sort by Description (vendor).
  3. Assign GL codes to transactions by vendor. 
  4. Develop standards. You can often do a VLookUP once the standards are set.
  5. Check for purchase orders written for transactions or bill payments already entered into NetSuite as credit card payments. If you find any, those transactions are excluded from the pivot table.
  6. To enter in detail, see our guide to credit card processing.
  7. To enter as a summary transaction, create a pivot table by GL Code and sum on Amount.
  8. Ensure the transaction total in Excel equals the statement balance.

   5.  Enter the totals by GL Code from the pivot table into NetSuite. Navigate to Transactions>Bank>Use Credit Card.


The second screenshot showing how to reconcile a credit card statement in NetSuite.


Note: The Vendor is “AMEX.” The Account is the “AMEX Liability Account.” The Date is the last day of the period and NOT the Due Date. (This is required for the expense to post in the period experienced.)


   6.  When payment is due:

  1. Create a Journal Entry.
  2. The Date is the Due Date.
  3. Debit the AMEX liability account. The name is AMEX + vendor name. (This is required to post correctly.)
  4. Credit Cash Account.
The third screenshot showing how to reconcile a credit card statement in NetSuite.

    7.  Match Bank Data. 

  1. Navigate to Transactions>Bank>Match Bank Data.
  2. Choose the AMEX Liability Account.
  3. Enter the desired date range (from the credit card statement).
  4. The imported daily transactions appear on the left, and the transactions entered directly into NetSuite appear on the right.
  5. Match the transactions by checking the box. Bill payments will match one-to-one. The remainder will be multiple transactions matched to the summary entry entered from the credit card statement.
  6. When all transactions are matched, the difference at the bottom will be zero. Click Match in the bottom left quadrant.
  7. Click Submit on the top left of the screen.


The fourth screenshot showing how to reconcile a credit card statement in NetSuite.


   8.  Reconcile the statement.

  1. Navigate to Transactions>Bank>Match Bank Data.
  2. Choose the AMEX Liability Account.
  3. Click Reconcile Account Statement at the top right of the screen.


The fifth screenshot showing how to reconcile a screenshot in NetSuite.


   d.  Enter the Statement End Date and Ending Statement Balance.

   e.  Check all transactions to clear. Checking the box in the header line will automatically check all transactions.

   f.  When the difference equals $0, click Reconcile.



The sixth screenshot showing how to reconcile a credit card statement in NetSuite.


If you have more questions about the Bank Data Matching and Reconciliation feature or other NetSuite tools, schedule a consultation with SuiteDynamics experts to discuss a custom training program. We’ll fill in your employees’ knowledge gaps so they can operate NetSuite confidently.


Schedule a FREE Consultation


Empower Your Staff with NetSuite


A NetSuite ERP can feel intimidating at first. It’s a massive system with a million moving parts, and it seems impossible to master. But trust us, it’s not. 


We know your staff wants to conquer this system, and SuiteDynamics experts are ready to help them do it.
Our training programs cover everything from bank reconciliations to dashboard customizations


We know you’ve got the right team to run NetSuite successfully. Let us prove it to you.


Schedule a FREE Consultation


Frequently Asked Questions


Does NetSuite allow me to set up auto-matching rules?


Yes, NetSuite does allow you to set up auto-matching rules. These rules are part of NetSuite's bank reconciliation functionality and help automate the process of matching transactions.


With NetSuite's auto-matching capabilities, you can:


  • Create custom rules that automatically match bank transactions with corresponding transactions in your NetSuite system.
  • Set specific criteria for matching, such as amount, date range, and transaction type.
  • Reduce manual reconciliation work by having the system identify probable matches.
  • Streamline your month-end close process through automated matching.


To set up auto-matching rules in NetSuite, you would navigate to the reconciliation rules module and configure the matching preferences based on your organization's needs. These rules can be tailored to different bank accounts and transaction types.


The auto-matching functionality helps improve accuracy while significantly reducing the time your accounting team spends on reconciliation tasks. This allows your employees to focus on more strategic financial activities instead.


Will NetSuite automatically post customer deposits?


Yes, NetSuite can automatically post customer deposits through the proper configuration of its automatic cash application module. When set up correctly, the platform will create and post customer deposit transactions upon payment receipt and can automatically apply these deposits to invoices based on predefined rules.

This automation typically works through payment gateway integrations or bank feeds that import transaction data. NetSuite matches incoming payments against open transactions and posts them according to your configured settings.


For effective implementation, you must configure appropriate payment methods, set up necessary integrations with payment processors or bank feeds, and define deposit allocation rules. Organizations implementing these automated processes typically see reduced manual data entry, faster cash application, and improved financial reporting accuracy.


Does NetSuite have a limit on the number of bank accounts you can integrate?


Yes, NetSuite limits the number of bank accounts you can integrate to 20 per instance.


While you can set up multiple bank accounts within your NetSuite environment, you can only establish direct bank feeds or automated connections with up to 20 accounts. This limitation applies to the standard NetSuite banking integration capabilities.


Is there a workaround if you exceed that limit?


Yes, there are several workarounds if you exceed NetSuite's 20 bank account limit for integration:


  • Use CSV imports: You can manually download transaction data from additional bank accounts and import it into NetSuite using CSV files. While this requires more manual effort, you can bring in data from unlimited accounts.
  • Third-party integration solutions: Several NetSuite partners offer banking integration tools that can overcome the native limit. These specialized solutions can expand your connection capabilities beyond the standard 20 accounts.
  • Rotate active connections: If you don't need real-time data from all accounts simultaneously, you can rotate which accounts are actively connected based on your reconciliation schedule.
  • Custom integration: For organizations with significant requirements, a custom integration using NetSuite's API can be developed to handle additional bank connections beyond the standard limit.
  • Bank account consolidation: In some cases, organizations might consider consolidating certain banking activities to reduce the number of accounts requiring direct integration.


The best approach depends on your needs, transaction volumes, and available resources. Many organizations with complex banking structures use a combination of these methods to manage their banking data effectively in NetSuite.


If my bank security won’t allow the native NetSuite bank integration, can I get my bank data into NetSuite?


Yes, there are several ways to get your bank data into NetSuite if your bank's security won't allow the native integration:


  • Manual CSV imports: You can download transaction data from your bank's online portal as CSV files and import them directly into NetSuite. While this requires manual steps, it works with virtually any bank.
  • Third-party integration providers: Several specialized services can bridge the gap between high-security banks and NetSuite. These providers often have additional security protocols that may satisfy your bank's requirements.
  • Bank statement uploads: NetSuite allows you to manually upload electronic bank statements (BAI, OFX, QBO formats) into the system for reconciliation purposes.
  • Custom API integration: For organizations with technical resources, a custom integration using your bank's API (if available) and NetSuite's web services can be developed to create a secure connection that meets your bank's security standards.


Most organizations with strict bank security requirements find that combining CSV imports and scheduled reconciliation processes provides a practical solution until more automated options become available.




Headshot of Grace Martin

Grace Martin is the Principal Finance Consultant at SuiteDynamics and possesses a unique dual expertise in both technology and finance. Her extensive experience spans virtually every financial position from auditor to CFO, complemented by her management of IT departments and leadership of multiple system implementations. She also spent nine years as a contract accountant and systems analyst for major manufacturing plants and ten years as Director of Finance and Management Information Systems at Dippin Dots, with roles as Controller and Global Cost and Pricing Analyst at Siemens Rail. At SuiteDynamics, Grace specializes in developing custom financial solutions that enhance native NetSuite functionality, with a personal focus on understanding client financial needs and ensuring correct GL impact for reporting. 





We pull information from NetSuite material, SuiteDynamics experts, and other reliable sources to compose our blog posts and educational pieces. We ensure they are as accurate as possible at the time of writing. However, software evolves quickly, and although we work to maintain these posts, some details may fall out of date. Contact SuiteDynamics experts for the latest information on NetSuite ERP systems.



Part of this text was generated using GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. After generating the draft language, our team edited, revised, and fact-checked it to ensure readability and accuracy. SuiteDynamics is ultimately responsible for the content of this blog post.

March 27, 2026
Spreadsheets built modern business. For decades they served as the unofficial operating system of job shops and custom manufacturers everywhere. They are flexible, familiar, and just comfortable enough to feel like a real solution. In the early days of a growing shop, they genuinely work. But as make-to-order complexity increases, as custom BOMs multiply, lead times tighten, and engineering revisions pile up, spreadsheets strain under the pressure. Every job is different, but spreadsheets want everything to be the same. In make-to-order environments, no two jobs are identical. Unique BOMs, custom routings, variable material costs, different setup requirements, customer-specific specs. Spreadsheets, though, thrive on repetition and standardized rows. So the more variation you introduce, the more tabs you create. The more exceptions you add, the more manual overrides appear. The more formulas you patch together, the more fragile the whole thing becomes. Eventually, the file turns into something only one person truly understands. That’s a liability, not a system. Capacity becomes a guessing game. In make-to-order shops, capacity isn’t theoretical. It’s constrained by reality. Machines go down. Operators vary in skill. Setup time fluctuates from job to job. Rush orders blow up carefully planned weeks. Spreadsheets struggle here because they’re built on static inputs. You can build a beautiful planning sheet with machine-hour allocations, but unless it dynamically adjusts for real-time job status, operator availability, overlapping resource conflicts, and maintenance downtime, you’re not really planning. You’re forecasting best-case scenarios. And that’s exactly how shops overpromise delivery dates and end up paying for it later in overtime and expediting costs. Engineering changes don’t cascade cleanly. Change is a constant in make-to-order manufacturing. A customer tweaks a dimension, a material substitution becomes necessary, or a tolerance tightens halfway through production. In an integrated system, that change automatically updates BOMs, routings, cost projections, and scheduling impact all at once. In a spreadsheet environment, it depends entirely on who remembers to update which tab. A routing might change without adjusting the labor estimate. A material substitution might never feed into the margin calculation. A lead-time adjustment might not reach the production schedule until it’s too late. These small disconnects multiply quickly, and because spreadsheets have no enforced relationships between data sets, the errors don’t announce themselves. Institutional knowledge becomes a single point of failure. Ask most growing job shops who owns the master spreadsheet and you’ll get a name. One estimator, planner, or operations manager who has become the living interpreter of years’ worth of embedded formulas, assumptions, and logic that nobody else fully understands. This works fine until it doesn’t. When that person goes on vacation, gets sick, or leaves, the shop loses operational clarity. In an environment already defined by complexity, having critical knowledge live inside one person’s mental model of a file is an inefficient bottleneck. Visibility stops at the file boundary. Spreadsheets are static snapshots. Make-to-order manufacturing is anything but. Without real-time feedback loops, shops find themselves unable to answer questions that should be simple: Are we actually on track this week? Which jobs are consuming more labor than quoted? Where is the bottleneck right now? Which customers consistently drive margin compression? When performance data doesn’t flow automatically from the floor back into quoting and planning, improvement stalls. You can’t refine what you can’t see. Here’s the thing about spreadsheet failure in manufacturing… it’s not dramatic. It’s gradual. First the files get slow, then fragile, then opaque. By the time leadership feels the real pain through late shipments, squeezed margins, and rising overtime, the architectural issues are widespread. Make-to-order manufacturing demands systems that understand relationships: how a routing affects capacity, how a BOM revision affects cost, how a delayed job cascades through the rest of the schedule. The question most shops ask is whether they can make the spreadsheets work. The better question is what it’s actually costing to keep them. The most resilient make-to-order manufacturers are building systems that preserve flexibility without sacrificing the visibility needed to actually run the business. Adaptability is the advantage. 
March 23, 2026
In custom manufacturing , when systems break down, profit rarely disappears all at once. It leaks. Quietly, repeatedly, and often in ways that never show up clearly on any report. Walk into almost any fabrication shop and you’ll hear some version of the same story: the backlog is strong, revenue looks good, we’re staying busy. And yet the margin feels thinner than it should. For job shops running custom work, profitability doesn’t usually collapse because of one bad decision. It erodes through small, daily inefficiencies buried inside quoting, scheduling, engineering changes, and the gap between what was planned and what actually happened on the floor. Here’s where shops most commonly lose efficiency, and how to get it back. The quote that was almost right. For custom orders, every quote is a prediction, and predictions are dangerous when they’re disconnected from real shop-floor data. Outdated labor standards, underestimated setup time, material prices that changed since the template was built, and capacity assumptions based on average weeks instead of current reality. These errors are each small on their own, but a 4% underestimate on labor here, a missed secondary operation there, add up across hundreds of jobs. Small errors compound into real margin loss. The best-performing shops treat quoting as a living system fed by actual job performance data, not static spreadsheets that nobody updates. Capacity that looks available but isn’t. On paper, there’s open space on the schedule. In practice, that open week includes a machine down for maintenance, a senior operator on vacation, two complex jobs already competing for the same bottleneck, and a rush order someone verbally committed to last Thursday. Without finite capacity planning, shops routinely overcommit based on theoretical machine hours rather than real-world constraints. The fallout is predictable: overtime spikes, expedited shipping costs, re-sequencing chaos, and exhausted operators. Margin shrinks not because the shop is incapable, but because it’s planning in averages. Engineering changes that never get repriced. Designs evolve. A hole moves, a weld spec changes, or a tolerance tightens. Each adjustment has a cost. But many shops hesitate to reprice midstream, worried about damaging the customer relationship, and end up absorbing the extra labor and rework time instead. Do this enough times and it becomes a cultural norm: “we’ll just take care of it.” That’s margin erosion disguised as good service. High-performing job shops track engineering change impact in real time and make repricing decisions based on data rather than discomfort. Setup time hiding in plain sight. In low-volume, high-mix environments, setup time is often the silent killer. When shops don’t track setup separately from run time, assume it’ll all come out in the wash, and never refine their routings based on what actually happened, they end up underpricing complexity. In job shops producing one to fifty unit runs, setup can represent a disproportionate share of total labor. If it isn’t measured accurately, it can’t be priced accurately. The spreadsheet layer nobody talks about. Most shops run a hybrid environment where the ERP handles transactions and spreadsheets handle reality. Capacity lives in one file, quoting assumptions in another, and actual job performance in someone’s head. This creates invisible disconnects. Quotes not aligned with current routing, schedules that don’t reflect real constraints, and historical performance that never feeds forward into better decisions. Each disconnect feels manageable in isolation. Collectively, they create margin leakage that leadership can feel but can’t quite locate. What makes all of this so frustrating isn’t that shop owners don’t care. It’s that they can’t see clearly enough to act decisively. Without integrated visibility across quoting, routing, capacity, and quality, operators run on instinct. And instinct works remarkably well until scale and complexity outpace it. The shops that consistently outperform aren’t necessarily the biggest or the busiest. They operate with clarity and consistency. Fewer assumptions and more decisions based on reality. In a manufacturing landscape where lead times keep shrinking and customers expect speed and precision at the same time, margin won’t be protected by effort alone.
January 5, 2026
Every manufacturing leader has lived this moment: The schedule looks perfect. Orders are slotted. Commitments are made. And then reality shows up. A machine goes down. A key operator calls out. Setup times balloon. One late job cascades into five. Suddenly the plan (built meticulously inside your ERP) falls apart. Not because your team failed, but because the plan was never grounded in reality to begin with.  The Hidden Lie Inside Most ERP Schedules
August 27, 2025
NetSuite’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) , built in partnership with Anthropic, helps users leverage AI to ask simple, natural-language questions and get back complex, structured analysis, all powered by live NetSuite data. This practical use of AI can be used to generate reports, create or update records, perform queries, analyze reports, automate workflows, or make predictions based on real-time data. Here's how you can get started and connect AI to NetSuite using MCP: 1. Login to NetSuite and navigate to Customization → SuiteCloud Development → SuiteApp Marketplace. 2. Search “MCP Tools” > Click on the icon and install the MCP Tools SuiteApp
job shop manufacturing
June 20, 2025
Job shop manufacturing is a production method where small batches of 1-100 units of customized or unique products are made to meet specific customer requirements. Unlike mass production, each order typically requires unique setups, specialized processes, and custom routing through the facility. In this comprehensive guide, you'll learn: The complete definition of job shop manufacturing How job shops differ from other manufacturing types Industries that rely on job shop methods Technology solutions that optimize job shop operations When to consider implementing specialized ERP systems What is Job Shop Manufacturing? (Definition) Job shop manufacturing is a production strategy focused on customization over volume . Instead of producing thousands of identical items, job shops create small quantities of unique products tailored to specific customer specifications. Key defining characteristics: Small batch sizes - Typically 1-100 units per order High product variety - Hundreds or thousands of different products Custom specifications - Each order has unique requirements Project-based workflow - Work orders last days to weeks Skilled labor - Requires specialized expertise and flexibility Job Shop is a powerful, fully integrated solution built for custom manufacturers, combining quoting, configuration, production, and fabrication workflows inside NetSuite. Learn more about SuiteDynamics' NetSuite Job Shop for Manufacturing.
A man is holding a box and a woman is looking at a tablet in a warehouse.
By Grace Martin May 27, 2025
Uncover the challenges of data quality affecting DIO accuracy, from ghost inventory to inconsistent formats. Find out how to tackle these issues effectively with a NetSuite ERP.
May 8, 2025
In the world of private equity, creating operational value has become increasingly critical as the market evolves. With exit timelines extending and competition for deals intensifying, PE firms are looking beyond financial engineering to drive returns. One emerging strategy that's gaining traction is the consolidation of NetSuite instances across portfolio companies. The Hidden Challenge of System Fragmentation As PE portfolios grow through acquisition, a common pattern emerges: multiple portfolio companies operating on separate NetSuite instances. While each system may work effectively in isolation, the fragmentation creates significant operational inefficiencies at the portfolio level: Redundant Licensing Costs: Each separate instance requires its own licensing structure , creating unnecessary expenses that directly impact EBITDA. Manual Consolidation Effort: Finance teams spend countless hours extracting, transforming, and manually consolidating data from disparate systems. Inconsistent Processes: Basic business functions are handled differently across portfolio companies, limiting standardization efforts. Limited Portfolio-Wide Visibility: Gaining insight across the entire portfolio requires extensive manual effort, delaying strategic decision-making. Integration Challenges: Onboarding new acquisitions becomes increasingly complex when each company maintains its own environment.
Esusu logo
April 30, 2025
Explore Esusu's partnership with SuiteDynamics to enhance financial processes. Schedule a consultation to see how your business can thrive with NetSuite solutions.
Image of an office worker and a laptop, illustrating the concept of case management setup.
By Brittany Klecker April 30, 2025
Discover how to effectively set up and configure case statuses, rules, types, priorities, and more in NetSuite's case management system. Streamline your workflow and improve customer support with this comprehensive guide.
A man is holding a stack of cardboard boxes in a warehouse.
By Grace Martin April 26, 2025
Backorders disrupt revenue and frustrate customers. Learn what "backordered" means, how backorders happen, their impact on businesses, and how NetSuite ERP can minimize the issues.
More Posts